PDF Ð BOOK Sexual Fluidity Understanding Women's Love and Desire

EBOOK Sexual Fluidity Understanding Women's Love and Desire

PDF Ð BOOK Sexual Fluidity Understanding Women's Love and Desire º Is love blind when it comes to gender For women it just might be This unsettling and original book offers a radical new understanding of the context dependent nature of female sexuality Lisa Diamond argues that for some women love and desire are not rThe psychology of love to the biology of sex differences Sexual Fluidity offers moving first person accounts of women falling in and out of love with men or women at different times in their lives For some gender becomes irrelevant I fall in love with the person not the gender say some respondents Sexual Fluidity offers a new understanding of women's sexuality and of the central importance of love 200710 Diamond asks a number of uestions why do women seem to experience fluidity in their sexual attractions and involvements over their lives than males do and what does such fluidity say about the categories gay straight bi that society seems to insist on She also raises a number of very intriguing issues why do we insist that anything that changes or shifts that can be described as a 'phase' is somehow 'inauthentic' or false Diamond looks at a ten year 1995 2005 sample of women bi lesbian hetero 'unlabelled' and finds that while each of her respondents has a 'core' attraction to same or other sex partners individual lives and loves are remarkably variable She argues that the categories we assign to sexuality are so affected by biology society place time and individual experience as to be useful only in the very broadest terms A well written book that argues that attraction love and sex are too individual to be rigidly categorised and that we are each of us authentic in the moment that changing preferences is not about being confused or inauthentic but about situations and a complex skein of needs and desires A good book to read when thinking about what it means to construct and insist upon categories

PDF ¶ Sexual Fluidity Understanding Women's Love and Desire Á Lisa Diamond

Is love blind when it comes to gender For women it just might be This unsettling and original book offers a radical new understanding of the context dependent nature of female sexuality Lisa Diamond argues that for some women love and desire are not rigidly heterosexual or homosexual but fluid changing as women move through the stages of life various social groups and most important different love relatio This may be the longest I've gone before writing a review for a book I finished but it's partly because of this book and partly because of just life Though right now I have no excuse other than the fact that I'm at work but pshaw so I just need to bite the bullet so this is no longer over my headThe idea behind the book was fine I expected a lot from the book itself however Diamond's study covered about ten years of research with a core group of women meeting with them periodically to see how their sexual experiences and feelings have changed over the years Her proof for lack of a better word is essentially that women exhibit a lot fluidity in their sexual preference than men Or somethingIt came up in discussion with a friend a while back that interestingly a lot of the women we've known who were self proclaimed lesbians at a certain point in their life wound up living with or marrying men whereas many of the men we've known who were self proclaimed gay never wound up with a woman This idea stuck with me and I figured this book would help explain some of that And it does sort ofBut I don't feel Diamond had a lot of diversity in her samples The women she interviewed all were relatively young late teens to late 20s I don't recall seeing anyone over the age of 31 and except for maybe one example that comes to mind were all white women Unfortunately this leaves out whole demographics that could add a different set of experiences As it was a lot of the stories were relatively similar and I didn't walk away feeling I learned anything newThere was limited information on transgender people another glaring hole in her study considering the rest of her research focused on the LGandB of LGBT acronym I was angry about this throughout most of the book until she included discussion of transgenders in one chapter though it wound up maybe being the shortest chapter I understand transgenders are relatively new as far as open discussion goes but it's not so new that it should have been overlooked for the purpose of this bookThe book as a whole probably could have been half the length considering there was so much repetition both in her explanation of the study and the brief interviews between participantsAgain an interesting idea but lacking inclusion which I found most problematic Maybe this 2008 publication is just already too out of date by 2016 standards especially since the majority of the study itself began in the 90s

Lisa Diamond Á Sexual Fluidity Understanding Women's Love and Desire KINDLE

Sexual Fluidity Understanding Women's Love and DesireNships This perspective clashes with traditional views of sexual orientation as a stable and fixed trait But that view is based on research conducted almost entirely on men Diamond is the first to study a large group of women over time She has tracked one hundred women for than ten years as they have emerged from adolescence into adulthood She summarizes their experiences and reviews research ranging from EBB FLOW Review By Hanne Blank WHAT TO MAKE OF COLLEGE women who are “lesbian until graduation” Or straight married women who suddenly fall in love with other women For that matter what about ueeridentified women— Anne Heche anyone— who wind up with men Perhaps they’re really bisexual or “confused” or maybe they were simply repressed or closeted Alarmists might imagine them victims of predatory dykes and Stockholm syndrome Or as University of Utah psychologist Lisa Diamond suggests in her captivating nuanced and rigorous Sexual Fluidity perhaps these experiences are simply normalDiamond’s study followed the sexual lives of nearly 100 young women over a 10 year period As her subjects fell in and out of love and lust with men and women often regardless of their own sexual orientations Diamond came to understand female sexuality not as a state of being with eternally fixed parameters but as a continuous dynamic process The picture that emerged was of female sexuality as a zone of probabilities rather than absolutes a context specific intensely attachment driven realm whose richness points up the poverty misogyny and political agendas of static categorybased models of sexualitySexual fluidity as distinct from bisexuality is a person’s capacity to “experience variation in their erotic and affectional feelings as they encounter different situations relationships and life stages” Diamond writes Statistically this capacity exists freuently in women than men This is not to say that a woman’s sexual orientation doesn’t matter; in fact Diamond affirms that it is an accurate predictor of her attractions But it is also common for women at some point in their lives to experience some level of attraction to both same sex and othersex partnersWe do not yet know why women should be like this though Diamond points to likely evolutionary neurobiological and cultural factors She found that when fluidity happens it is typically highly situational and emotional— a matter of the right person at the right time—as well as utterly involuntaryThis is volatile politically risky stuff and Diamond knows it; her work has already been cited by advocates of “ex gay” therapy After all if sexual attractions are changeable then they can be intentionally changed right Wrong As Diamond’s research demonstrates fluidity is not a matter of choice Indeed her subjects describe frustration with their inability to control sexual attractions that contradict the identity labels they want to claim Like puberty fluidity is thrust upon usDiamond’s work is vital precisely because sexual fluidity is not a new concept—Freud called his version “polymorphous perversity”— but merely one that is typically dismissed Nor is it news to women particularly not to a generation for whom a nonspecific “ueer” affiliation or no affiliation at all is increasingly common What is so important is not that this fluidity exists but that someone has finally paid it systematic attention and found that it is in fact not the exception but may well be the ruleHANNE BLANK is the author of six books including Virgin The Untouched History Bloomsbury USA